Litton Systems, Inc., 316 F. Supp. 401 (C.D. Cal. 1970). It is stipulated that Litton''s decision not to hire Gregory as a sheet-metal worker was predicated upon his statement that he had been arrested fourteen times, and not upon any consideration of convictions, or of national security, the latter a point relevant to certain of Litton''s
BARBOUR, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on the Motion of the Plaintiff, Litton Systems, Inc., d/b/a Ingalls Shipbuilding Division ("Litton"), for partial summary judgment on the eighth, ninth and tenth counts of the Defendant Trustee''s counterclaim (quantum meruit and unjust enrichment/third-party beneficiary claims).
On December 18, 1991, summary judgment was entered at the request of defendant, Litton Systems, Inc. An appeal was taken and on April 20, 1993, this court reversed the summary judgment in an unpublished opinion. ( Barnes v. Litton Systems, Inc. (Apr. 20, 1993) B064749.) Upon remand, plaintiff filed a cost memorandum.
LITTON BUSINESS SYSTEMS, INC. is a New Hampshire Foreign Profit Corporation filed on November 14, 1925. The company''s filing status is listed as Withdrawn and its File Number is 2169. The Registered Agent on file for this company is C T Corporation System and is located at 9 Capitol St, Concord, NH 03301. The company''s principal address is 201
Litton Systems, Inc. v. Whirlpool Corporation, 728 F.2d 1423, 221 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 97, 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 14850 — Brought to you by Free Law Project, a non-profit dedicated to creating high quality open legal information.
Find company research, competitor information, contact details & financial data for LITTON SYSTEMS INC. of Charlotte, NC. Get the latest business insights from Dun & Bradstreet.
Plaintiff Barbara Sargent brought this action in state court on March 10, 1993 against Litton Systems, Inc., Litton Industries, Inc., Dalmo Victor, Inc., General Instrument Corp. and unnamed defendants, alleging injuries arising out of the termination of her employment at Litton Systems, Inc.
of 183 ALR-74 radar warning receiver (RWR) systems was awarded to appellant Litton Systems, Inc., Applied Technology Division (ATD) at the not-to-exceed (NTE) price ceiling of $131,734,780 by Warner Robins Air Logistics Center, Robins Air Force Base, Georgia on 3 December 1984. The RWR systems were to be installed in aircraft to
Find out what works well at Litton Systems, Inc from the people who know best. Get the inside scoop on jobs, salaries, top office locations, and CEO insights. Compare pay for
Litton Industries, Inc. ("Litton") and Litton Systems, Inc. seek review of a final order of the Federal Trade Commission ("FTC") holding that certain microwave oven advertisements published by Litton Microwave Cooking Products ("LMCP") violated section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act, 15 U.S.C. § 45, and ordering petitioners to cease and
Litton Electron Devices, a leader in high-technology markets for advanced electronic, defense, and information systems worldwide, has made a long-term commitment to
Clifton Precision, a Div. of Litton Systems, Inc. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. Jul 29, 1993. 150 F.R.D. 525 (E.D. Pa. 1993) holding that conferences between witnesses and counsel are prohibited both during the deposition and during recesses. Summary of this case from Pastura v. CVS Caremark
28 U.S.C. § 2514; see S E Contractors, Inc. v. United States, 406 U.S. 1, 1517, 92 S.Ct. 1411, 31 L.Ed.2d 658 (1972). Nevertheless, Litton was asked to forego a right as a price for the government''s termination of the investigation. Specifically, Litton was asked to give up its right to bar the Board''s reconsideration of its claims.
A Statement of Defence and Counterclaim was filed by the Air Force of the Islamic Republic of Iran ("IAF") on 1 February 1983. After a further exchange of pleadings, a pre-hearing conference was held on 1 May 1985. The Tribunal subsequently ruled, in its Order of 31 May 1985, that the correctly designated Claimant was Litton Systems, Inc
OverviewOther US inertial systems of the early 1960sBackgroundFunctional descriptionOperation of the LN-3GenealogyLN-3 maintenance and test equipmentLN-3 units on display
The Litton LN-3 was one of the first inertial navigators on a production aircraft, but other systems, either inertial navigators or inertial measurement units, of other brands and for various applications with comparable technology existed. The Autonetics Radar Enhanced Inertial Navigation System (REINS) of the North American A-5 Vigilante was more or less comparable to the LN-3/PHI-4. This system was derived from the XN
Poly-Sci was founded 50 years ago and was acquired in the early 1960''s by Litton Industries, Inc. Litton subsequently acquired Clifton Precision and merged it with the Poly-Sci Division. Moog Inc. is a worldwide manufacturer of precision control components and systems. Moog''s high-performance actuation products control military and
Litton Systems, Inc. v. American Telephone and Telegraph Co., 568 F. Supp. 507 (S.D. N.Y.1983). The Court of Appeals affirmed that decision. 746 F.2d 168 (2d Cir.1984). [5] AT & T has objected to Litton''s request that paralegal fees be included in the lodestar amount. However, since in the discussion below I decline to apply a multiplier to the
企查查为您提供litton marine systems, inc.的最新工商信息、公司简介、公司地址、电话号码、招聘信息、信用信息、财务信息、法律诉讼等多维度详细信息查询,让您对litton marine systems, inc.能够做到全面的了解！
LITTON BUSINESS SYSTEMS, INC. is a Montana Foreign Corporation filed on November 12, 1925. The company''s filing status is listed as Inactive and its File Number is F001938. The Registered Agent on file for this company is C T Corporation System and is located at 3011 American Way, Missoula, MT 59808-0000. The company''s principal address is 201
CONNER, District Judge: In its Opinion and Order filed June 4, 1981 (" Opinion" ), 90 F.R.D. 410, with which familiarity is assumed, this Court, on de novo consideration, affirmed the Findings and Conclusions of Magistrate Kent Sinclair, Jr. that counsel for plaintiffs (collectively " Litton" ) had been guilty of gross negligence and intentional misrepresentation in responding to discovery
OPINION AND ORDER. CONNER, District Judge: This case is presently before the Court on plaintiffs'' objections to Magistrate Kent Sinclair, Jr.'' s Findings and Conclusions on Motions for Discovery Sanctions dated April 16, 1981 and defendants'' request for reconsideration of their motion under Rule 37(b)(2), F.R.Civ.P. for dismissal of this action or preclusion of plaintiffs''
Thomas Betts Corporation ("T B") appeals from the decision of the United States District Court for the District of Delaware that T B''s U.S. Patent No. 3,990,767 ("the Narozny patent"), issued November 9, 1976, for an "Electrical Contact and Connector Means Employing Same," has not been infringed by the manufacture and sale by Litton Systems
litton industries, inc. Litton developed and manufactured navigation, guidance and control, electronic warfare and command, control and communications systems and information...
In November of 1967, Falcon Tankers, Inc. entered into a contract with Litton Systems, Inc. for the construction of four oil tankers. Litton thereafter contracted with Worthington Corporation to manufacture *901 deepwell, self-priming, variable speed cargo pumps to be used to load and unload liquid jet fuel.
Falcon Tankers, Inc., a Delaware corporation contracted with Litton Systems, Inc., also a Delaware corporation, for Litton to design, construct and sell to Falcon a tanker to be known as the "Falcon Lady". The design was prepared by Litton
Litton Life Support, a division of Litton Systems, Inc., is the world leader in the utilization of gas separation technology for military and civilian applications. We''ve been using
LITTON MARINE SYSTEMS INC. is an Oklahoma Foreign For-Profit Business Corporation filed on November 5, 1986. The company''s filing status is listed as Merged and its File Number is 2300450162. The Registered Agent on file for this company is Corporation Service Company and is located at 115 Sw 89th St, Okla City, OK 73139-8511.
Read Litton Systems, Inc. v. United States, 449 F.2d 392, see flags on bad law, and search Casetext''s comprehensive legal database Litton Systems, Inc. v. United States, 449 F.2d 392 | Casetext Search + Citator
CONNER, District Judge: On June 30, 1981, following a five-month jury trial involving complicated issues of antitrust liability, this Court entered judgment in favor of plaintiffs ("Litton") against defendants ("AT T") in the amount of $276,774,729. That judgment, as amended on July 20, 1981, was unanimously affirmed by the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit on February 3,
McCann alleges that Litton Systems, Inc., ("Litton") forced him into retirement when he turned sixty-five years of age, thus engaging in unlawful age discrimination. A district court jury found for McCann and assessed damages at $246,000. Litton subsequently moved for judgment non obstante veredicto and, in the alternative, a new trial. The
LITTON BUSINESS SYSTEMS, INC. is a Minnesota Business Corporation (Foreign) filed on November 10, 1925. The company''s filing status is listed as Inactive and its File Number is 4436. The Registered Agent on file for this company is C T Corporation System Inc and is located at 405 2nd Ave S, Mpls, MN 55401. The company''s principal address is 405
Falcon Tankers, Inc. v. Litton Systems, Inc., Del per., 355 A.2d 898, 908 (1976). After persuading Litton to use expansion joints rather than "O" rings to absorb flexing and to connect the pump column with the suction can, Worthington negotiated with Uniroyal for the purchase of the joints. Uniroyal''s engineering department told its sales
Litton's most significant contribution to the high technology field was its inertial guidance system, which helped keep planes on their flight routes. As a direct result of the effectiveness of this system, Litton procured a $1.6 billion contract from the Saudi Arabian Air Force. Problems at Ingalls Shipbuilding were eventually corrected.
In 1998, Litton Industries bought TASC, Inc. In 2000, TASC sold three stand-alone commercial operations: Adesso Software, WSI (Weather Services International) Corporation and Emerge. The company reported sales of $5.6 billion and a net income of $218 million for the 2000 fiscal year.
Litton Industries, a vacuum tube manufacturer located near San Francisco, California, seemed the ideal choice. The only problem involved raising the $1.5 million necessary to purchase the firm from its founder, Charles Litton. After an agreement with Joseph Kennedy collapsed, Thornton and Ash approached Lehman Brothers, an investment firm.
One of Litton's most important acquisitions was Ingalls Shipbuilding Corporation, the country's third largest private shipbuilder. The large but ailing company was purchased for $8 million in cash and the assumption of $9 million in debt.
